Portfolio

Early on in every photographer’s career, one of the biggest issues is that you lack material for your portfolio. Had you told me three years ago that I would spend hundreds of hours over the course of months reviewing, sorting, and editing through thousands of pictures spanning dozens of productions to create the strongest possible portfolio consisting of merely a couple dozen pictures, I would have asked you for a time machine.

But now, I’ve done just that: edited a portfolio (a few of them, actually) and built a completely new website around it. My hope was to showcase my best work, adjusting tones and colors to my ever evolving taste from scratch, and to present it in a clean environment that doesn’t distract from the pictures. Thus, I introduce to you my new website, a few months in the making:

http://www.mikepadua.com

I’ve gone with a new website provider, PhotoShelter. In terms of pure value, they’re the ones to beat if you’re looking for a provider that will showcase your photography. Customization options abound, and their themes are very crisp and clean (coincidentally, the theme I chose for my website happened to be called “Crisp”).

Vallejo Shakespeare in the Park will be presenting “Othello” this summer and I had the opportunity to create some promo photographs for their show. The main differences with the promotional photography and production photography is that with the promo stuff, I light and pose the actors. With production photos, I’m basically a fly on the wall during a dress rehearsal–commonly during tech week, and more commonly during the very last dress rehearsal before a show opens–when the show is picture ready.

Theatre companies need the promo pictures well before a show opens so they can (you guessed it) promote the show with plenty of time before it opens. This is especially important because prospective audience members are more likely to go see a show if they have a way connect with the characters beforehand.

For the shot(s) above, I shot the actors separately against a green screen, lit them with small flashes with shoot-through umbrella attachments, and created a composite in Photoshop. I went into the shoot with a firm concept of what the final product was going to be, so I lit and posed each actor accordingly.

For Othello, I knew I wanted to bring out the contours of his face and create depth with strong shadows, so I placed my main light camera left at a hard 90 degree angle towards the subject, which fills in his face but also casts a distinct shadow to the right of the camera. I then placed a fill light at a 45 degree angle camera right. This gave me a face that was well lit, and shows us exactly what Othello looks like, but it’s not flat and evenly lit.

For Iago, I wanted his face more filled in, but with one side more  “lost” in shadow–almost as if he was being obscured by Othello’s shadow. I placed the key light 45 degrees camera right and angled his face just so that one side was almost completely obscured except for his eye–people always focus on the eyes, so I didn’t want to lose it. I had one more light behind and above him to give his hair a little depth, but I didn’t want a classic back/rim light scenario–just a tiny splash of light on his hair.

Finally, I wanted to give Desdemona the same light/shadow depth that I gave Othello. I had to walk the lights back a couple of feet since I shot a bit wider to get more body length. Due to the way she was posed, I noticed that the fill light being at 45 degrees was hitting her flat against her back, and the contours of her arm seemed to get lost, so both the main and fill light were placed 90 degrees on either side of the frame.

I took these shots using the Canon EOS 7D with the ST-E2 Speedlite Transmitterattachment. Even though the 7D features wireless flash control built in, there’s less digging into menus when I use the ST-E2. I used three 430EX II flashes on light stands, two of them with umbrellas.

After the shoot, I went through the usual workflow of Photo Mechanic > Lightroom > Photoshop to create the final composite image you see at the beginning of the post. Lots of fun, and more planning and post-production involved than a dress rehearsal shoot, but the end result was really worth it. One thing I regret is not capturing behind the scenes photos of the lighting setups themselves. Because of limited budgets, I didn’t have an assistant on this shoot so all the lightstand moving was done by yours truly. Hopefully next time I’ll have a bit more time to do so.

Make sure to check out the event here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=123487851078062

I recently took part in Theatre Bay Area‘s annual Vendor Conference in San Francisco where I had an opportunity to show my best work to the Theatre community. This facilitated a heavy edit of my current portfolio of theatrical images where I made selects and post-processed from scratch every show I’ve shot, from the beginning. It was a long process but the results were worth it, and it made me realized how much my taste, and ability to post-process an image, has changed. I used an X-Rite Eye-One Display 2 (tip: Pantone, GretagMacbeth, and X-Rite versions of this product are all the same thing) to calibrate my monitor so I could make sure that the colors displayed on my monitor, and eventually printed, were accurate, taking the guesswork out of the equation.

Having to edit many thousands of images down to about 100 to show at my table, and down to six to print large on my display, is not easy, and better left to professional editors, but just not feasibly in the budget for me so I had to fire up the coffeemaker and hunker down for about a week. As always, I used Photo Mechanic for it’s speed to make selects and add ratings, and then Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 to adjust exposure, tone, and color.

I added Photo Mechanic to my workflow about a year ago because it’s just plain fast. I use it only for selection and rating–basically editing down a take to the best photos to then process and deliver. It is a huge time saver for me, because a single show will, on average, yield about 1000 – 1200 photos. Of those, only 40-60 will be delivered, and they need to be delivered fast. I’ve made it a policy to deliver selects within 24 hours; the clients need the photos to publicize the production on their website, Facebook, and send photos to news outlets.

Take a look at the newly edited (and ever-changing) portfolio here.

I had a chance to shoot Helen Pau’s original play, “The Stone Wife” at the Berkeley City Club. The challenge of this show was that it was theater-in-the-round, which meant that I had to cover the performers from 360 degrees. In addition, I had to do so in a very confined space.

I was allowed to shoot an early dress rehearsal as a test run and to get familiarized with the actors’ blocking so I could make sure I was in the right spots at the right times to capture the best of the performances. The prep shoot helped quite a bit–the first time around I found myself photographing the actors’ backs more than I would like to admit. It was definitely one of the bigger challenges I’ve faced so far, because even though the performance was happening in a relatively small space, there was a lot of movement to keep up with.

After seeing the performance and getting to test shoot it once, I found that I was better prepared by the time the final dress rehearsal came around and all makeup, wardrobe, set pieces, and lights were in place. The director and producers were happy with the results.

See the whole set here.

Need photos for your theatrical production? Booking information.

Questions, comments, or just want to be social? Get in touch.